Many of our clients requested a third party technical review from experts in the field of Optical analysis. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology was the initial request from all. However, after discussions with Professor Erich Ippen of the MIT Physics department, he suggested the following: “I recommend John Greivenkamp to you very highly. Certainly he is more expert than I on the subject. The Optical Sciences Center at the University of Arizona is a pre-eminent institution for optical engineering, and John is one of its most distinguished faculty members.”

For results of the technical review by the Optical Sciences Center of America and Dr. John Greivenkamp Phd. Please call or write for a copy of his credentials and a letter stating the results of his review and study of the system and technology behind it.

Articles published about our technology:

• Computer Engineers create proportion grade program, New York Diamonds magazine January 1998
  
• Just how much sparkle, Diamond International magazine May/June 1998
  
• Cut grading...Only the computer knows for sure, Letter to the editor August 7, 1998 Rapaport Diamond report. In response to article published in the June 5, 1999 Rapaport Diamond report titled
  Defining the well made fancy...A far off goal.
  
• The great cut debate rages on, Rapaport Diamond report February 5, 1999 In response to article published by GIA in the January 8, 1999 Rapaport Diamond report titled GIA Sets science to work on cut question.
  
• Making the cut by Sharon Wakefield Various opinions from industry professionals about cut grade. The opinions of Paul Shannon and Diamond Technologies Inc. are at the top of the article published in the November 5, 1999 Rapaport Diamond report.